The receiver did live up to its billing and measured watts x 2 into a 4-ohm load, along with making its other numbers. Those two elements also contribute to much of the Azur R’s pound heft, despite its relatively modest size. Finally, I used just one of the two main subwoofer outputs. These are merely the first and most obvious clues that the Azur R isn’t cut from the same cookie-cutter mold as the bulk of its competition – the first inkling that Cambridge is aiming for a different sort of consumer, with a different sort of taste, who is drawn more to pure audio performance than streaming Internet features and smartphone app control. The back of the R is so densely packed with connectivity, in fact, that it may be a few beats before you notice the presence of another anachronistic inclusion and one notable omission when contrasted with the bulk of today’s big-box AV receiver offerings: Oddly, though, it ends up not really mattering much, because I imagine anyone in the market for a receiver of this caliber has every intention of pulling out the SPL meter and measuring tape and adjusting everything manually.
The receiver did live up to its billing and measured watts x 2 into a 4-ohm load, along with making its other numbers. Digital audio lock speed? The Hookup Another interesting although certainly not unwelcome throwback is the Azur R’s positively retro-tastic graphical onscreen interface, which lacks all of the transparent overlays and pastel colors of most modern receivers, but features a nice, intuitive layout that provides logical access to the unit’s wealth of audio, video, and input options. What allows its rugged, all-metal chassis to be so short is what Cambridge calls X-Tract, a hybrid cooling technique. The back panel’s small, silk-screened labeling also made hookup a bit of a struggle for these old eyes. Needless to say, that didn’t work, a fact that became apparent as soon as I tried to run the Audyssey 2EQ setup program. But looks deceive on both counts.
I am also thinking of getting new speakers and the glowing review of the Goldenear TritonCinema Three got me salivating. My main priority is classical music and I really liked the musicality of the R.
The back panel’s small, silk-screened labeling also made hookup a bit of a struggle rdceiver these old eyes. Levels were completely out of whack.
Cambridge Audio Azur 551r AV Receiver
The Azur R is very nearly Submitted by krawiec on May 30, – 4: The Azur R is rated at 90 watts per channel into 8 ohms in stereo, and Cambridge claims watts into 6 ohms. It Submitted by greenavis on January 27, – 6: Oh is great topic i like it, Good working brother is amazing good luck uome article. If this were a receiver marketed toward a newbie general audience, this would be unforgiveable.
These receiver brands offer audiophile performance at what I would call moderate prices—although the owner of doghouse monoblocks would consider them cheap, while penny pinchers at the other end receiveer the spectrum would consider them sky high.
Create new account Request new password. Best car games flash. Would they be a good match for the Azur R or alternatives? And, worst of all, it miscalculated the appropriate crossover point between the MASS satellites and sub to an astonishing degree.
In my experience, that depends as much on the quality of the room correction as on the ideology of the listener. Submitted by Ladyfingers on August 17, – 4: Sonos Amp Streaming Amplifier Review.
One of the things I most like Submitted by erhalten Sie hier on May 23, – 5: The Jimi Hendrix Experience: Really grateful for it.
Cambridge Audio Azur r AV Receiver | eBay
Even if you’re not in the market for a new receiver, purely as a fan of AV tech, you owe it auzr yourself to find a Cambridge Azur R receiver and – if you can lift this meaty beast without herniating a disc – take a quick gander at its hindquarters. Cambridge has also assured me that in the coming months they will have a new USB 2.
Specs, pricing, and availability were still fluid at press time. What allows its rugged, all-metal chassis to be so short is what Cambridge calls X-Tract, a hybrid cooling technique. Thanks for the nice blog.
The R also lacks zone two capability, which is reserved for the step-up models. Email us and tell us why you think this product should receive a higher rating. One of the things I most like is surfing around in the internet and getting to find awesome content like this one. These are merely the first and most obvious clues that the Azur R isn’t cut from the same cookie-cutter mold as the bulk of its competition – the first inkling that Cambridge is aiming for a different sort of consumer, with a different sort of taste, who is drawn more to pure audio performance than streaming Internet features and smartphone app control.
Cambridge Audio Azur 551R 7.1 Channel 90 Watt Receiver
The second inkling comes by way of a glance through the beautifully milled ventilation slots on the top of the receiver to the colossal custom toroidal transformer that pretty much hogs the entire front left quadrant of the interior of the R, as well as the thick heat sink and fan mechanism that runs down its center from front to back.
The third big clue that this definitely isn’t your typical mass-market family room receiver requires a bit of digging into the manual or spec sheet, where you’ll discover that the R boasts Anagram Technologies Adaptive Time Filtering, which upsamples incoming digital audio signals and applies jitter suppression before passing the results along to the receiver’s DACs. I also owned a T briefly.
Another notable omission is one of the more sophisticated low-volume listening modes: Finally, I used just one of the two main subwoofer outputs. The soon-to-arrive Azur R is expected to be rated at 95 watts times seven, and the Hoem R at watts times seven, both into 8 ohms, with considerably more power into lower impedances.
As much as I was excited to get cihema Network audio features are also conspicuous in their absence.
Cambridge Audio Azur R Channel 90 Watt Receiver | eBay
Disagree with our product rating? However after persistent communication with NAD support they released a firmware update that fixed the issue I love it. It has four HDMI inputs and one output, all in back. Given the density of 5551r back panel, hooking up the Azur R is certainly a little more time-consuming than I’ve become accustomed to as of late. Those two elements also contribute to much of xzur Azur R’s pound heft, despite its relatively modest size. I hope so, anyway